<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 605 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172933</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, and the Supreme Court heard counsel for the appellant before dismissing the civil appeals. The text records only the procedural disposition and does not set out any substantive legal reasoning or principle on Central Excise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 11:30:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 605 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172933</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, and the Supreme Court heard counsel for the appellant before dismissing the civil appeals. The text records only the procedural disposition and does not set out any substantive legal reasoning or principle on Central Excise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>