<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 2 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal due to a time bar issue related to the levy of service tax and penalty. The Commissioner (Appeals) wrongly applied the wrong provision for the limitation period, and the appeal was filed within time. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on merit after providing a reasonable opportunity for the appellants to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 2 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal due to a time bar issue related to the levy of service tax and penalty. The Commissioner (Appeals) wrongly applied the wrong provision for the limitation period, and the appeal was filed within time. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on merit after providing a reasonable opportunity for the appellants to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>