<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 217 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263549</link>
    <description>Service tax paid on cylinder inspection and certification used for filling compressed natural gas cylinders qualified as input service under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The service was necessary before CNG could be dispensed or sold because cylinders had to be certified fit for use, and this nexus with manufacture and business activity was not broken merely because the certification occurred outside the factory. Cenvat credit was therefore admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 217 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263549</link>
      <description>Service tax paid on cylinder inspection and certification used for filling compressed natural gas cylinders qualified as input service under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The service was necessary before CNG could be dispensed or sold because cylinders had to be certified fit for use, and this nexus with manufacture and business activity was not broken merely because the certification occurred outside the factory. Cenvat credit was therefore admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>