<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 212 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263544</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, a tower parts manufacturer, in a case concerning the eligibility for a refund of service tax paid on outward transportation. The Tribunal held that rejecting the refund claim based on the appellant not claiming a refund for inward transportation was unjustified, as there was no direct link between the two. The appellant&#039;s decision regarding inward transportation did not impact their entitlement to seek a refund for tax paid on outward transportation. The Tribunal found the authorities&#039; stance to be without merit and provided consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 212 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263544</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, a tower parts manufacturer, in a case concerning the eligibility for a refund of service tax paid on outward transportation. The Tribunal held that rejecting the refund claim based on the appellant not claiming a refund for inward transportation was unjustified, as there was no direct link between the two. The appellant&#039;s decision regarding inward transportation did not impact their entitlement to seek a refund for tax paid on outward transportation. The Tribunal found the authorities&#039; stance to be without merit and provided consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>