<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 206 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263538</link>
    <description>Non-supply of certain non-relied upon documents and floppies did not vitiate the adjudication where the relied upon documents had already been furnished, repeated opportunities were given, and the appellants declined to cooperate on the ground that all desired material was not supplied. The Court also accepted the concurrent factual findings of the adjudicating authority and tribunal that the transactions were sham, involving paper movements, fictitious units, fake invoices, and non-transportation of goods, supported by confessional statements showing fraud. On that basis, the plea of breach of natural justice was rejected and no substantial question of law was found to arise; the excise appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 206 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263538</link>
      <description>Non-supply of certain non-relied upon documents and floppies did not vitiate the adjudication where the relied upon documents had already been furnished, repeated opportunities were given, and the appellants declined to cooperate on the ground that all desired material was not supplied. The Court also accepted the concurrent factual findings of the adjudicating authority and tribunal that the transactions were sham, involving paper movements, fictitious units, fake invoices, and non-transportation of goods, supported by confessional statements showing fraud. On that basis, the plea of breach of natural justice was rejected and no substantial question of law was found to arise; the excise appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>