<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 199 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263531</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original confirming a demand against the main appellant and penalties on directors and works manager due to the denial of cross-examination of witnesses. The case was remanded for fresh consideration, emphasizing the necessity of cross-examination in cases based on statements. The Tribunal left all issues open for the adjudicating authority to review and did not express any opinion on the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 199 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263531</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original confirming a demand against the main appellant and penalties on directors and works manager due to the denial of cross-examination of witnesses. The case was remanded for fresh consideration, emphasizing the necessity of cross-examination in cases based on statements. The Tribunal left all issues open for the adjudicating authority to review and did not express any opinion on the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>