<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 193 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263525</link>
    <description>Customs valuation of the nine containers was unsustainable because the goods were test-checked as correctly declared vegetable fatty acid, while the enhancement relied on unsupported assumptions of superior quality and unusable comparison data; the valuation was therefore set aside. For the tenth container, the material did not clearly establish the product as crude palm oleic or any other classified form, and the valuation based on tariffication lacked legal justification; the redemption fine was also not imposable because the goods had already been released and were no longer available. The appeal succeeded, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 193 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263525</link>
      <description>Customs valuation of the nine containers was unsustainable because the goods were test-checked as correctly declared vegetable fatty acid, while the enhancement relied on unsupported assumptions of superior quality and unusable comparison data; the valuation was therefore set aside. For the tenth container, the material did not clearly establish the product as crude palm oleic or any other classified form, and the valuation based on tariffication lacked legal justification; the redemption fine was also not imposable because the goods had already been released and were no longer available. The appeal succeeded, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>