<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 177 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263509</link>
    <description>A co-operative credit society carrying on credit activities for members was treated as distinct from a co-operative bank, so deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) remained available. Section 80P(4) was held to exclude only co-operative banks and not credit co-operative societies, and the earlier acceptance of the same claim in a prior year, without any change in facts, supported that view. The disallowance was deleted; the interest ground was consequential.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 07:49:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 177 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263509</link>
      <description>A co-operative credit society carrying on credit activities for members was treated as distinct from a co-operative bank, so deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) remained available. Section 80P(4) was held to exclude only co-operative banks and not credit co-operative societies, and the earlier acceptance of the same claim in a prior year, without any change in facts, supported that view. The disallowance was deleted; the interest ground was consequential.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>