https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263503 The Tribunal found the Assessing Officer's order erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue's interests due to discrepancies in commission payment, quantitative details, and interest issues. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the CIT's decision to set aside the assessment order for further examination of these matters. However, the Tribunal deemed the AO's handling of nominal bank charges as non-erroneous. The appeal was partially allowed, with the order pronounced on 11/8/2015. en-us Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Sep 2015 07:49:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263503 The Tribunal found the Assessing Officer's order erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue's interests due to discrepancies in commission payment, quantitative details, and interest issues. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the CIT's decision to set aside the assessment order for further examination of these matters. However, the Tribunal deemed the AO's handling of nominal bank charges as non-erroneous. The appeal was partially allowed, with the order pronounced on 11/8/2015. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263503