<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1157 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172927</link>
    <description>Delay in filing a review petition can render the petition not maintainable where no sufficient ground for condonation is shown, and the Court may refuse to entertain review on that basis. The Court also examined the review on merits and found no substantive ground to reopen or revise the earlier order, declining to exercise review jurisdiction. The review petition was therefore dismissed both for delay and for absence of merit, with no relief granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1157 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172927</link>
      <description>Delay in filing a review petition can render the petition not maintainable where no sufficient ground for condonation is shown, and the Court may refuse to entertain review on that basis. The Court also examined the review on merits and found no substantive ground to reopen or revise the earlier order, declining to exercise review jurisdiction. The review petition was therefore dismissed both for delay and for absence of merit, with no relief granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>