<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 1 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a stay on the recovery of the balance amount and allowed the appeal to proceed, finding that the appellants had established a prima facie case for a waiver of the service tax. The Tribunal noted that services rendered by brokers could be considered falling under the definition of &quot;clearing and forwarding agents,&quot; contrary to the appellant&#039;s arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 1 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a stay on the recovery of the balance amount and allowed the appeal to proceed, finding that the appellants had established a prima facie case for a waiver of the service tax. The Tribunal noted that services rendered by brokers could be considered falling under the definition of &quot;clearing and forwarding agents,&quot; contrary to the appellant&#039;s arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>