<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 915 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172920</link>
    <description>Where an exemption scheme makes investment conditional on prior approval for withdrawal from an escrow account, the jurisdictional excise authority must decide each withdrawal application within a reasonable time and cannot leave it pending indefinitely. The investment period for the permissible investment is construed to run only from communication of the withdrawal decision, not from the date of deposit in the escrow account, so that the beneficiary is not penalised for administrative delay and possible forfeiture.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 915 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172920</link>
      <description>Where an exemption scheme makes investment conditional on prior approval for withdrawal from an escrow account, the jurisdictional excise authority must decide each withdrawal application within a reasonable time and cannot leave it pending indefinitely. The investment period for the permissible investment is construed to run only from communication of the withdrawal decision, not from the date of deposit in the escrow account, so that the beneficiary is not penalised for administrative delay and possible forfeiture.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>