<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 920 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172918</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC upheld the penalty imposed under Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for availing input service tax credit during October 2005 to March 2006, overturning the decision of the CESTAT which had deleted the penalty due to its pre-2010 insertion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 920 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172918</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC upheld the penalty imposed under Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for availing input service tax credit during October 2005 to March 2006, overturning the decision of the CESTAT which had deleted the penalty due to its pre-2010 insertion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>