https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172916 Writ relief is ordinarily not maintainable to challenge internal inter-departmental communications absent a direct legal injury from a final administrative act. On repeal of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, pending proceedings abate if actual physical possession had not been taken under section 10(6). However, relief remains unavailable where the claimant cannot prove a lawful title chain, the surplus declaration has attained finality, and the relied-upon transfers are hit by the ceiling prohibitions and unsupported by proper pleadings or documents. Equitable writ jurisdiction will not assist a party lacking clean hands, and a transaction void from inception cannot be validated by later events. en-us Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 15:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172916 Writ relief is ordinarily not maintainable to challenge internal inter-departmental communications absent a direct legal injury from a final administrative act. On repeal of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, pending proceedings abate if actual physical possession had not been taken under section 10(6). However, relief remains unavailable where the claimant cannot prove a lawful title chain, the surplus declaration has attained finality, and the relied-upon transfers are hit by the ceiling prohibitions and unsupported by proper pleadings or documents. Equitable writ jurisdiction will not assist a party lacking clean hands, and a transaction void from inception cannot be validated by later events. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172916