<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 608 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172903</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appeal as barred by limitation because the application for condonation of delay in filing the petition of appeal had already been rejected. No order as to costs was made. The order reflects a limitation-based termination of the appeal without any adjudication on the underlying central excise dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 14:14:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 608 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172903</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appeal as barred by limitation because the application for condonation of delay in filing the petition of appeal had already been rejected. No order as to costs was made. The order reflects a limitation-based termination of the appeal without any adjudication on the underlying central excise dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>