<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Upholds Decision: Export Attempt of Non-Conforming Basmati Rice Exceeds Permissible Limits, Violates DGFT Notification.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24543</link>
    <description>Goods not in conformity with Basmati Rice – presence of other rice, i.e. non-basmati rice, was more than permissible maximum limit of 20% - Additional Commissioner was justified in his conclusion that Respondent had attempted to export non-Basmati Rice prohibited for export in terms of DGFT notification - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 13:35:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 13:35:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Upholds Decision: Export Attempt of Non-Conforming Basmati Rice Exceeds Permissible Limits, Violates DGFT Notification.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24543</link>
      <description>Goods not in conformity with Basmati Rice – presence of other rice, i.e. non-basmati rice, was more than permissible maximum limit of 20% - Additional Commissioner was justified in his conclusion that Respondent had attempted to export non-Basmati Rice prohibited for export in terms of DGFT notification - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 13:35:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>