https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172897 The majority held that section 71 of the Bihar Town Planning and Improvement Trust Act, 1951, read with the Schedule, did not exclude the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 but applied it to acquisitions for the Trust subject to the specified modifications. The first publication of notice under section 46 of the Bihar Act was treated as equivalent to a section 4(1) notification under the Land Acquisition Act, except where an earlier section 4 notification or section 6 declaration was already in force, and sections 33 and 69 were read as permitting compulsory acquisition by the State Government. On that basis, the section 4 notifications were valid. The dissenting view was that the Bihar Act was a self-contained special code requiring exclusive compliance with its own procedure. en-us Fri, 07 Dec 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Sep 2015 12:23:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172897 The majority held that section 71 of the Bihar Town Planning and Improvement Trust Act, 1951, read with the Schedule, did not exclude the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 but applied it to acquisitions for the Trust subject to the specified modifications. The first publication of notice under section 46 of the Bihar Act was treated as equivalent to a section 4(1) notification under the Land Acquisition Act, except where an earlier section 4 notification or section 6 declaration was already in force, and sections 33 and 69 were read as permitting compulsory acquisition by the State Government. On that basis, the section 4 notifications were valid. The dissenting view was that the Bihar Act was a self-contained special code requiring exclusive compliance with its own procedure. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Dec 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172897