https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172894 A rehabilitation policy for displaced families must be applied according to its text and practical limits: agricultural land is to be provided only where possible, with genuine State efforts to secure suitable land or assist in purchase, but the policy cannot be expanded by implication. Major sons of oustees were not treated as separate displaced families for separate agricultural allotment. The Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal Award did not extend to the Omkareshwar Project, and the landless labourer condition in the clearance did not create an independent right to agricultural land. The State could also abandon acquisition under Section 48 for the agricultural land because possession had not been taken, while the dwelling units on the land remained entitled to rehabilitation under the policy. en-us Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Oct 2015 19:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172894 A rehabilitation policy for displaced families must be applied according to its text and practical limits: agricultural land is to be provided only where possible, with genuine State efforts to secure suitable land or assist in purchase, but the policy cannot be expanded by implication. Major sons of oustees were not treated as separate displaced families for separate agricultural allotment. The Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal Award did not extend to the Omkareshwar Project, and the landless labourer condition in the clearance did not create an independent right to agricultural land. The State could also abandon acquisition under Section 48 for the agricultural land because possession had not been taken, while the dwelling units on the land remained entitled to rehabilitation under the policy. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172894