https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172878 For rent-control purposes, limitation for an application to fix standard rent runs from the date of the relevant direct tenancy, not from an earlier sub-tenancy, and a later tenant is not denied the statutory remedy by reference to the prior arrangement. An interpolated or legally non-existent order directing deposit of future rent cannot support striking off a tenant's defence, because adverse consequences require a valid rent determination or interim order. Delay in challenging such an order may be condoned where the appeal was filed promptly after restoration of the proceedings and refusal would permit a nullity to operate, causing grave injustice. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter remitted. en-us Mon, 23 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Sep 2015 10:27:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172878 For rent-control purposes, limitation for an application to fix standard rent runs from the date of the relevant direct tenancy, not from an earlier sub-tenancy, and a later tenant is not denied the statutory remedy by reference to the prior arrangement. An interpolated or legally non-existent order directing deposit of future rent cannot support striking off a tenant's defence, because adverse consequences require a valid rent determination or interim order. Delay in challenging such an order may be condoned where the appeal was filed promptly after restoration of the proceedings and refusal would permit a nullity to operate, causing grave injustice. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter remitted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 23 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172878