<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 163 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263495</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, an autonomous body under the Societies Act, 1860, in a case concerning the taxability of outdoor catering service and space rental services. The Tribunal rejected the tax liability imposed by the Commissioner, stating that the appellant did not meet the criteria to be considered an &quot;outdoor caterer&quot; and that their turnover for the Mandap Keeper Service fell within exemption limits. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the tax demand and penalties, allowing the appeals and stay applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 163 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263495</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, an autonomous body under the Societies Act, 1860, in a case concerning the taxability of outdoor catering service and space rental services. The Tribunal rejected the tax liability imposed by the Commissioner, stating that the appellant did not meet the criteria to be considered an &quot;outdoor caterer&quot; and that their turnover for the Mandap Keeper Service fell within exemption limits. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the tax demand and penalties, allowing the appeals and stay applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>