<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 161 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263493</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of abatement under specific notifications as the services provided fell under completion and finishing services. The case was remanded for further assessment of entitlement to notification benefits and the adjustment of excess service tax paid, emphasizing compliance with specified conditions for benefit eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 161 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263493</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of abatement under specific notifications as the services provided fell under completion and finishing services. The case was remanded for further assessment of entitlement to notification benefits and the adjustment of excess service tax paid, emphasizing compliance with specified conditions for benefit eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>