<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 159 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263491</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the service tax demand due to the contract&#039;s nature primarily focused on grinding rock phosphate, with ancillary tasks. The demand was deemed time-barred as it extended beyond the one-year period from the show cause notice. Penalties were not imposed, citing the interpretation of law, making the invocation of the extended period unsustainable. The dismissal was based on substantive and time-bar grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 159 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263491</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the service tax demand due to the contract&#039;s nature primarily focused on grinding rock phosphate, with ancillary tasks. The demand was deemed time-barred as it extended beyond the one-year period from the show cause notice. Penalties were not imposed, citing the interpretation of law, making the invocation of the extended period unsustainable. The dismissal was based on substantive and time-bar grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>