<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 5 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103</link>
    <description>Section 117 of the Finance Act, 2000 validated collection of service tax from goods transport operator services and required repayment of any tax refunded under a judgment, decree or order within the prescribed period, failing which interest at 24% per annum became recoverable. The assessee did not dispute the principal refunded tax and sought relief only on financial hardship grounds against the interest demand. The Tribunal held that the statutory wording made interest payable, following its earlier view that tax, penalty and interest were all leviable under the provision, with only prosecution excluded. The interest demand was therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 5 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103</link>
      <description>Section 117 of the Finance Act, 2000 validated collection of service tax from goods transport operator services and required repayment of any tax refunded under a judgment, decree or order within the prescribed period, failing which interest at 24% per annum became recoverable. The assessee did not dispute the principal refunded tax and sought relief only on financial hardship grounds against the interest demand. The Tribunal held that the statutory wording made interest payable, following its earlier view that tax, penalty and interest were all leviable under the provision, with only prosecution excluded. The interest demand was therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>