https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263472 The High Court of Bombay dismissed two separate motions seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals from the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 1997-98. One motion by a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) and the other by an individual, both filed by the same Constituted Attorney, failed to provide sufficient specific details justifying the delays. The court emphasized the need for sound reasons with specific particulars for condonation of delay and found the affidavits lacking in this regard. Consequently, the court upheld the decision to not condone the delays and dismissed both motions, disposing of the appeals accordingly. en-us Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Sep 2015 07:46:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263472 The High Court of Bombay dismissed two separate motions seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals from the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 1997-98. One motion by a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) and the other by an individual, both filed by the same Constituted Attorney, failed to provide sufficient specific details justifying the delays. The court emphasized the need for sound reasons with specific particulars for condonation of delay and found the affidavits lacking in this regard. Consequently, the court upheld the decision to not condone the delays and dismissed both motions, disposing of the appeals accordingly. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263472