<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 121 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263453</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, quashing the notice u/s 148 and the subsequent assessment order. The decision was based on the lack of independent application of mind by the Assessing Officer in reopening the assessment, emphasizing the necessity for the AO to independently assess income escapement rather than solely relying on higher authorities&#039; directions or observations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 121 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263453</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, quashing the notice u/s 148 and the subsequent assessment order. The decision was based on the lack of independent application of mind by the Assessing Officer in reopening the assessment, emphasizing the necessity for the AO to independently assess income escapement rather than solely relying on higher authorities&#039; directions or observations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>