<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 117 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263449</link>
    <description>Condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 depends on a real and satisfactory explanation showing sufficient cause; a liberal approach does not cure unexplained laches or negligence. Applied to a delayed revision against rejection of an objection under Section 47 CPC, the State&#039;s failure to challenge the earlier order in time and its attempt to wait until execution steps were taken did not amount to sufficient cause, so the delay could not be condoned and the condonation order was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 07:44:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 117 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263449</link>
      <description>Condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 depends on a real and satisfactory explanation showing sufficient cause; a liberal approach does not cure unexplained laches or negligence. Applied to a delayed revision against rejection of an objection under Section 47 CPC, the State&#039;s failure to challenge the earlier order in time and its attempt to wait until execution steps were taken did not amount to sufficient cause, so the delay could not be condoned and the condonation order was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>