<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 117 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263449</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court overturned the High Court&#039;s decision to condone the delay in filing a revision petition by the respondent-state. The Court emphasized that while a pragmatic approach is warranted, serious laches and negligence by the State cannot justify condonation of delay. It highlighted the importance of not mechanically condoning delays without sufficient cause, particularly when the State fails to promptly challenge a decree. The judgment underscored the need for a balanced approach in condoning delays, ultimately setting aside the High Court&#039;s decision and rejecting the condonation of delay in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 07:44:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 117 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263449</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court overturned the High Court&#039;s decision to condone the delay in filing a revision petition by the respondent-state. The Court emphasized that while a pragmatic approach is warranted, serious laches and negligence by the State cannot justify condonation of delay. It highlighted the importance of not mechanically condoning delays without sufficient cause, particularly when the State fails to promptly challenge a decree. The judgment underscored the need for a balanced approach in condoning delays, ultimately setting aside the High Court&#039;s decision and rejecting the condonation of delay in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>