https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172875 Section 19(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 requires deliberate application of mind, specification of the documents sought with sufficient particularity, and a real nexus between the requisition and the Act's statutory purpose. An omnibus order covering many papers, including materials unrelated to that purpose, does not satisfy the condition precedent and is liable to be quashed. A separate challenge based on mala fides and want of authority under Article 77 failed because the record did not establish bad faith and the order was issued by an authorised officer on behalf of the President. en-us Tue, 07 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 08 Nov 2015 19:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172875 Section 19(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 requires deliberate application of mind, specification of the documents sought with sufficient particularity, and a real nexus between the requisition and the Act's statutory purpose. An omnibus order covering many papers, including materials unrelated to that purpose, does not satisfy the condition precedent and is liable to be quashed. A separate challenge based on mala fides and want of authority under Article 77 failed because the record did not establish bad faith and the order was issued by an authorised officer on behalf of the President. Case-Laws FEMA Tue, 07 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172875