https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172872 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's order and quashing the complaint and proceedings against the appellants. It held that the High Court should have exercised its jurisdiction to prevent the abuse of the legal process, emphasizing that summoning an accused is a serious matter requiring careful consideration of facts and law. The Court found that the complaint under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act lacked sufficient evidence linking the appellants to the alleged offense, highlighting discrepancies in labeling requirements. en-us Tue, 04 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Sep 2015 17:31:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172872 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's order and quashing the complaint and proceedings against the appellants. It held that the High Court should have exercised its jurisdiction to prevent the abuse of the legal process, emphasizing that summoning an accused is a serious matter requiring careful consideration of facts and law. The Court found that the complaint under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act lacked sufficient evidence linking the appellants to the alleged offense, highlighting discrepancies in labeling requirements. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172872