https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172866 The Supreme Court declined to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution, stating that the case was not fit for interference on the facts and circumstances presented. The Special Leave Petition was dismissed accordingly. The order does not decide any substantive central excise issue and records only the refusal of leave. en-us Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Sep 2015 16:14:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172866 The Supreme Court declined to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution, stating that the case was not fit for interference on the facts and circumstances presented. The Special Leave Petition was dismissed accordingly. The order does not decide any substantive central excise issue and records only the refusal of leave. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172866