https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172861 The court found clauses (b) and (f) of Regulation 6A to be unconstitutional, directing the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission to reconsider the appellant's inter-state trading license application without those provisions. The court stressed the need for clear and specific disqualification criteria, upheld the importance of legitimate expectations, and highlighted the necessity for delegated legislation to align with the parent Act. The appellant's rights were upheld, and the appeals were allowed with costs awarded. en-us Mon, 11 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Nov 2015 08:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172861 The court found clauses (b) and (f) of Regulation 6A to be unconstitutional, directing the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission to reconsider the appellant's inter-state trading license application without those provisions. The court stressed the need for clear and specific disqualification criteria, upheld the importance of legitimate expectations, and highlighted the necessity for delegated legislation to align with the parent Act. The appellant's rights were upheld, and the appeals were allowed with costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172861