https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172859 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision in correcting the manifest error made by the appellate authority. It affirmed that the authority under Section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act has the jurisdiction to determine the terms of the contract and the categorization of employees. The High Court's intervention under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution was deemed justified, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with costs. en-us Mon, 12 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Sep 2015 15:40:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172859 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision in correcting the manifest error made by the appellate authority. It affirmed that the authority under Section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act has the jurisdiction to determine the terms of the contract and the categorization of employees. The High Court's intervention under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution was deemed justified, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172859