https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172859 A writ of certiorari may correct a manifest error of law apparent on the face of the record, and the High Court was justified in interfering under Articles 226 and 227 where the appellate authority plainly misread the wage agreement by treating one clause as controlling another. The Payment of Wages Act authority also had jurisdiction under section 15 to entertain claims from employees in the disputed category because the classification issue was incidental to deciding whether wages were actually payable. The applications were competent, the appeal failed, and the authority could decide the matter according to law. en-us Mon, 12 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Sep 2015 15:40:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172859 A writ of certiorari may correct a manifest error of law apparent on the face of the record, and the High Court was justified in interfering under Articles 226 and 227 where the appellate authority plainly misread the wage agreement by treating one clause as controlling another. The Payment of Wages Act authority also had jurisdiction under section 15 to entertain claims from employees in the disputed category because the classification issue was incidental to deciding whether wages were actually payable. The applications were competent, the appeal failed, and the authority could decide the matter according to law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172859