<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (3) TMI 78 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172858</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court analyzed the validity of rules, appointments, and executive powers in a case involving the Mysore Public Service Commission and State Government. It determined that the rules in question were not made under Article 309, allowing the State Government to make appointments without specific recruitment rules. The Court affirmed the State Government&#039;s authority under Article 162 to make appointments and upheld the validity of appointments made by the State. Allegations of mala fides in the selection process were dismissed due to lack of conclusive evidence. The Court allowed the appeals, set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, and granted relief to all appellants under Article 142 without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 15:35:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (3) TMI 78 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172858</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court analyzed the validity of rules, appointments, and executive powers in a case involving the Mysore Public Service Commission and State Government. It determined that the rules in question were not made under Article 309, allowing the State Government to make appointments without specific recruitment rules. The Court affirmed the State Government&#039;s authority under Article 162 to make appointments and upheld the validity of appointments made by the State. Allegations of mala fides in the selection process were dismissed due to lack of conclusive evidence. The Court allowed the appeals, set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, and granted relief to all appellants under Article 142 without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>