<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 499 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172857</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the civil appeal was held to be insufficiently explained even after a supplementary affidavit. The Court dismissed the application for condonation of delay, and the civil appeal consequently stood dismissed. The operative point is that where the delay is not properly accounted for, the appeal cannot proceed on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 15:32:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 499 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172857</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the civil appeal was held to be insufficiently explained even after a supplementary affidavit. The Court dismissed the application for condonation of delay, and the civil appeal consequently stood dismissed. The operative point is that where the delay is not properly accounted for, the appeal cannot proceed on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>