<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 866 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172853</link>
    <description>In a Central Excise matter, the Supreme Court recorded that it had heard counsel and found no merit in the civil appeal, which was dismissed. The order does not state any substantive legal reasoning, statutory interpretation, or factual findings beyond the dismissal, and it makes no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 15:11:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 866 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172853</link>
      <description>In a Central Excise matter, the Supreme Court recorded that it had heard counsel and found no merit in the civil appeal, which was dismissed. The order does not state any substantive legal reasoning, statutory interpretation, or factual findings beyond the dismissal, and it makes no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>