https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172851 Service of an allotment letter sent by registered post to the correct address carries a rebuttable presumption of receipt under the General Clauses Act and the Evidence Act. A writ court should not entertain a new disputed factual plea, such as non-receipt, when it was not raised before the statutory authorities and would require evidence and rebuttal. Because the respondent neither accepted the allotment nor made the required payment or executed the hire-purchase agreement, no concluded contract or enforceable right to allotment arose. The cancellation of the allotment and the orders of the appellate and revisional authorities were therefore upheld. en-us Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 18:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172851 Service of an allotment letter sent by registered post to the correct address carries a rebuttable presumption of receipt under the General Clauses Act and the Evidence Act. A writ court should not entertain a new disputed factual plea, such as non-receipt, when it was not raised before the statutory authorities and would require evidence and rebuttal. Because the respondent neither accepted the allotment nor made the required payment or executed the hire-purchase agreement, no concluded contract or enforceable right to allotment arose. The cancellation of the allotment and the orders of the appellate and revisional authorities were therefore upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172851