<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1919 (12) TMI 1 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172848</link>
    <description>An unregistered charge created in favour of a company officer over company property could not be enforced by that officer under the Explanation to Section 68 of the Indian Companies Act, 1882. Although non-registration did not generally invalidate a mortgage or charge, the Explanation barred an officer from availing himself &quot;as such&quot; of an unregistered security affecting company property. The court held that this prohibition applied even where the officer was under a duty to secure registration, and rejected narrower readings that would confine the bar to a special capacity or only while the person remained an officer. The charge was therefore unenforceable by the officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 1919 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 14:45:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1919 (12) TMI 1 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172848</link>
      <description>An unregistered charge created in favour of a company officer over company property could not be enforced by that officer under the Explanation to Section 68 of the Indian Companies Act, 1882. Although non-registration did not generally invalidate a mortgage or charge, the Explanation barred an officer from availing himself &quot;as such&quot; of an unregistered security affecting company property. The court held that this prohibition applied even where the officer was under a duty to secure registration, and rejected narrower readings that would confine the bar to a special capacity or only while the person remained an officer. The charge was therefore unenforceable by the officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 1919 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>