https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172846 A decision quashing higher charges at the framing stage was confined to the material then available and did not curtail a criminal court's later statutory powers to alter charge or commit the case under the Code of Criminal Procedure. The observations made for Sections 209, 228 and 240 could not be read as overriding later powers under Sections 216, 323, 397, 399 and 401, and any alleged misreading could be corrected in appeal or revision. The curative petitions also failed to meet the strict threshold for such relief and were delayed without satisfactory explanation, so curative relief was declined and the pending Sessions proceedings were left undisturbed. en-us Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Nov 2017 15:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172846 A decision quashing higher charges at the framing stage was confined to the material then available and did not curtail a criminal court's later statutory powers to alter charge or commit the case under the Code of Criminal Procedure. The observations made for Sections 209, 228 and 240 could not be read as overriding later powers under Sections 216, 323, 397, 399 and 401, and any alleged misreading could be corrected in appeal or revision. The curative petitions also failed to meet the strict threshold for such relief and were delayed without satisfactory explanation, so curative relief was declined and the pending Sessions proceedings were left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172846