<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 639 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172843</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of a steel manufacturing firm regarding the classification for service tax on Engineering Consultancy services. The appellant&#039;s argument that only professionally qualified engineers and engineering firms were subject to the levy during the relevant period was upheld. The Tribunal distinguished a High Court judgment, ruling in favor of the appellant based on settled law that only Engineering Firms were liable for service tax during that period. The Tribunal provided consequential relief, emphasizing that previous judgments cited by the revenue did not address the specific issue at hand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 13:07:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 639 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172843</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of a steel manufacturing firm regarding the classification for service tax on Engineering Consultancy services. The appellant&#039;s argument that only professionally qualified engineers and engineering firms were subject to the levy during the relevant period was upheld. The Tribunal distinguished a High Court judgment, ruling in favor of the appellant based on settled law that only Engineering Firms were liable for service tax during that period. The Tribunal provided consequential relief, emphasizing that previous judgments cited by the revenue did not address the specific issue at hand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>