https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172832 A challenge to an ex parte suspension order of a CHA licence was not entertained because a later order, passed after hearing the respondent, continued the suspension. The earlier order was treated as having merged into the subsequent order, so the legality of the ex parte order did not require separate adjudication. The existence of a separate challenge to the later order was also noted, and the appeal was disposed of without examining the initial suspension order on its own. en-us Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Sep 2017 18:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172832 A challenge to an ex parte suspension order of a CHA licence was not entertained because a later order, passed after hearing the respondent, continued the suspension. The earlier order was treated as having merged into the subsequent order, so the legality of the ex parte order did not require separate adjudication. The existence of a separate challenge to the later order was also noted, and the appeal was disposed of without examining the initial suspension order on its own. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172832