<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 91 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263423</link>
    <description>The case involved appeals against confirmed duty demands on two companies for alleged clandestine removal of finished goods. The Adjudicating Authority&#039;s denial of cross-examination of witnesses was deemed a violation of natural justice. The case highlighted the importance of fair trial and cross-examination for the reliability of statements. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fair trial, including cross-examination, to ensure the reliability of evidence and directed the case to be remanded for proper adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 07:47:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 91 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263423</link>
      <description>The case involved appeals against confirmed duty demands on two companies for alleged clandestine removal of finished goods. The Adjudicating Authority&#039;s denial of cross-examination of witnesses was deemed a violation of natural justice. The case highlighted the importance of fair trial and cross-examination for the reliability of statements. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fair trial, including cross-examination, to ensure the reliability of evidence and directed the case to be remanded for proper adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>