https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263413 The Supreme Court clarified the interpretation of downgrading Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs), emphasizing the need for reasons and communication to employees. Non-communication of ACR entries to public servants was deemed arbitrary, with legal consequences impacting promotions and benefits. The Court highlighted the importance of communication for fairness and employee awareness. It established that judgments on ACRs apply universally and stressed the need for consistency. The appellant's promotion made further action unnecessary, but the right to seek retrospective promotion was acknowledged. An intervention application was rejected, allowing independent pursuit of legal remedies. en-us Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Aug 2015 18:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263413 The Supreme Court clarified the interpretation of downgrading Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs), emphasizing the need for reasons and communication to employees. Non-communication of ACR entries to public servants was deemed arbitrary, with legal consequences impacting promotions and benefits. The Court highlighted the importance of communication for fairness and employee awareness. It established that judgments on ACRs apply universally and stressed the need for consistency. The appellant's promotion made further action unnecessary, but the right to seek retrospective promotion was acknowledged. An intervention application was rejected, allowing independent pursuit of legal remedies. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263413