https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263410 Condonation of a 1203-day delay in seeking restoration of an appeal was refused because the explanation was unsupported by essential particulars. The claimed change in the panel of advocates and lack of communication with earlier counsel did not explain the period after dismissal, did not state when the dismissal order came to the deponent's knowledge, and gave no details of efforts to contact counsel or verify the status of the appeal. The affidavit was therefore treated as unsatisfactory, and restoration was denied. en-us Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Sep 2015 07:46:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263410 Condonation of a 1203-day delay in seeking restoration of an appeal was refused because the explanation was unsupported by essential particulars. The claimed change in the panel of advocates and lack of communication with earlier counsel did not explain the period after dismissal, did not state when the dismissal order came to the deponent's knowledge, and gave no details of efforts to contact counsel or verify the status of the appeal. The affidavit was therefore treated as unsatisfactory, and restoration was denied. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263410