<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1377 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172807</link>
    <description>The Central Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) initially rejected the petitioners&#039; request for waiver of pre-deposit, leading to a modification application. Subsequently, the Tribunal reduced the pre-deposit from Rs. 1.25 crores to Rs. 75,00,000 due to the petitioners&#039; financial difficulties. Despite the dismissal of the financial hardship plea initially, the Court acknowledged the petitioners&#039; financial challenges and reduced the pre-deposit further to Rs. 30,00,000. The appeal decision was contingent on compliance with the revised pre-deposit terms, ensuring fair consideration of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1377 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172807</link>
      <description>The Central Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) initially rejected the petitioners&#039; request for waiver of pre-deposit, leading to a modification application. Subsequently, the Tribunal reduced the pre-deposit from Rs. 1.25 crores to Rs. 75,00,000 due to the petitioners&#039; financial difficulties. Despite the dismissal of the financial hardship plea initially, the Court acknowledged the petitioners&#039; financial challenges and reduced the pre-deposit further to Rs. 30,00,000. The appeal decision was contingent on compliance with the revised pre-deposit terms, ensuring fair consideration of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>