<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 681 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172805</link>
    <description>For the period before 16-6-2005, maintenance or repair service under Section 65(64) of the Finance Act, 1994 attracted service tax only where the activity was carried out under a maintenance contract. On the facts, the assessees were acting under work orders and not a maintenance contract, so the levy did not apply. The Tribunal followed the earlier coordinate Bench view and held that the absence of a maintenance contract kept the activity outside the taxable category, with the demand unsustainable and consequential relief available to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 10:12:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 681 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172805</link>
      <description>For the period before 16-6-2005, maintenance or repair service under Section 65(64) of the Finance Act, 1994 attracted service tax only where the activity was carried out under a maintenance contract. On the facts, the assessees were acting under work orders and not a maintenance contract, so the levy did not apply. The Tribunal followed the earlier coordinate Bench view and held that the absence of a maintenance contract kept the activity outside the taxable category, with the demand unsustainable and consequential relief available to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>