<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Expenditure on brand building doesn&#039;t ensure capital benefit or lasting business value, despite statutory recognition of intangible assets.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24506</link>
    <description>Just because an expenditure is debited in books towards brand building, which it purportedly is, and statutory recognition has since been accorded to such an intangible asset, as a “brand” would not by itself imply that an advantage in the capital field, or of enduring value to the business has, arisen to the assessee upon incurring the expenditure. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 08:25:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 08:25:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Expenditure on brand building doesn&#039;t ensure capital benefit or lasting business value, despite statutory recognition of intangible assets.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24506</link>
      <description>Just because an expenditure is debited in books towards brand building, which it purportedly is, and statutory recognition has since been accorded to such an intangible asset, as a “brand” would not by itself imply that an advantage in the capital field, or of enduring value to the business has, arisen to the assessee upon incurring the expenditure. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 08:25:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>