<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 52 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263384</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, setting aside the denial of input service credit on security guards, telephone connections, and professional charges. The appellant provided invoices during the appeal, justifying their entitlement to credit if compliant with conditions. The judgment emphasized the necessity of examining invoices and the nexus between input and output services for cenvat credit eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 52 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263384</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, setting aside the denial of input service credit on security guards, telephone connections, and professional charges. The appellant provided invoices during the appeal, justifying their entitlement to credit if compliant with conditions. The judgment emphasized the necessity of examining invoices and the nexus between input and output services for cenvat credit eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>