<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 45 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263377</link>
    <description>Completed assessments under the State sales tax law could not be reopened on the basis of a later departmental clarification drawn from an interpretation of the Central Excise Tariff. The clarification, issued after finalisation of the assessments, could not retrospectively enhance the tax rate or create a new fiscal burden. Where the tax entry remained ambiguous, the benefit had to be given to the assessee. The challenge to the writ court&#039;s order failed, and the protection of finalised assessments against retrospective revision was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 45 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263377</link>
      <description>Completed assessments under the State sales tax law could not be reopened on the basis of a later departmental clarification drawn from an interpretation of the Central Excise Tariff. The clarification, issued after finalisation of the assessments, could not retrospectively enhance the tax rate or create a new fiscal burden. Where the tax entry remained ambiguous, the benefit had to be given to the assessee. The challenge to the writ court&#039;s order failed, and the protection of finalised assessments against retrospective revision was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>