<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 1 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79</link>
    <description>For a newly registered assessee facing the initial application of service tax, the Tribunal held that the revisional enhancement of penalty for delayed filing and payment could not be sustained, particularly where the delays showed a progressive reduction and earlier lenient Tribunal decisions applied. The enhanced penalty imposed in revision was set aside. The original penalty order of the Deputy Commissioner was not challenged separately and therefore remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 1 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79</link>
      <description>For a newly registered assessee facing the initial application of service tax, the Tribunal held that the revisional enhancement of penalty for delayed filing and payment could not be sustained, particularly where the delays showed a progressive reduction and earlier lenient Tribunal decisions applied. The enhanced penalty imposed in revision was set aside. The original penalty order of the Deputy Commissioner was not challenged separately and therefore remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>