https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263372 The Tribunal set aside the previous order and directed a fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority within three months. The appeals were allowed for a reevaluation of issues regarding exemption eligibility, duty interpretation, applicability of notifications, time bar for duty demand, and declaration requirements. The appellants argued for exemption under Notification No. 8/2004-CE for compound used in manufacturing chewing tobacco, emphasizing procedural benefits over substantive reasons. The Tribunal's decision granted a fair hearing and remanded the case for further review. en-us Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Sep 2015 11:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263372 The Tribunal set aside the previous order and directed a fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority within three months. The appeals were allowed for a reevaluation of issues regarding exemption eligibility, duty interpretation, applicability of notifications, time bar for duty demand, and declaration requirements. The appellants argued for exemption under Notification No. 8/2004-CE for compound used in manufacturing chewing tobacco, emphasizing procedural benefits over substantive reasons. The Tribunal's decision granted a fair hearing and remanded the case for further review. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263372