https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263368 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the manufacturing units in a case involving allegations of producing pan masala instead of branded chewing tobacco. Despite contradictory reports from different laboratories, the Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the Revenue's claim of using lime and katha in the manufacturing process. Based on expert reports and buyer statements, the Tribunal concluded that the manufacturing units had a strong prima facie case, allowing the stay petitions in their favor and dispensing with the pre-deposit of dues, interest, and penalties. en-us Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Sep 2015 07:34:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263368 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the manufacturing units in a case involving allegations of producing pan masala instead of branded chewing tobacco. Despite contradictory reports from different laboratories, the Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the Revenue's claim of using lime and katha in the manufacturing process. Based on expert reports and buyer statements, the Tribunal concluded that the manufacturing units had a strong prima facie case, allowing the stay petitions in their favor and dispensing with the pre-deposit of dues, interest, and penalties. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263368